Jump!
That which is nothing shall never be known.
Yet, that which is truth shall bring forth knowledge of its own accord.
Some provocative quotes:
We can assume that most people, most of the time, are moral creatures. But imagine that this morality is like a gearshift that at times gets pushed into neutral. When that happens, morality is disengaged. If the car happens to be on an incline, car and driver move precipitously downhill. It is then the nature of the circumstances that determines outcomes, not the driver's skills or intentions[.] ... [E]xperimental research ... illustrates the ease at which morality can be disengaged by the tactic of dehumanizing a potential victim...
For many, [the] belief of personal power to resist powerful situational and systemic forces is little more than a reassuring illusion of invulnerability. Paradoxically, maintaining that illusion only serves to make one more vulnerable to manipulation by failing to be sufficiently vigilant against attempts of undesired influence subtly practiced on them.~Philip Zimbardo, The Lucifer Effect (Understanding How Good People Turn Evil)
Desiderata

Progress
Goal orientation
With focus on end result
An outcome-based approach
With no real end in sight
This is the conundrum
Of absolute power
Under the guise
Of Progress
The nadir on a circle
Starts with one group
Joined in a common goal
Of living in prosperity
And a tendency to shift
Along the perimeter
To experience
The circle’s roundness
The direction of the shift
Matters quite little
But a goal is established
With subsequent momentum
In one direction or another
Until the group has come full circle
And gained the realization
Of its wayward journey
And onward to the next link
In a chain of events
That represents
The emergence of power
Inherent to the group
That struggles for prosperity
And envisions progress
As an external event
Yet when all is one
And one is whole
When the group is balanced
In its current state of being
There is no striving
No goals no progress
No wants no needs
All is sufficient
For all of these strivings
Are conditions of deficiency
And as such
Our group is deficient
Fearful to admit lacking
As we tout our grandiosity
And move with furious pace
To the apex of absolute power
And so this progress
Is itself the goal
Which is never reached
Just as Hell
Destroys itself forever
And Tantalus thirsts
For the drink of freedom
Which will never come
Now is the time
Like no other
To ask ourselves
What indeed we seek
And to relinquish the search
For something better
When all we have
Is who we are
Here and now
J
Death is an illusion

In any case, I have just allowed my original lamentation to regress into some metaphysical discourse so I could digress from being pissed. I went to the library to do some work (pissed as usual) and became sidetracked when I picked up America, by Robert Crumb. As pissed as I was, it had me in stitches while it validated my own perceptions on similar matters, and I read through it in about an hour. Crumb effectively describes existential depression as manifested by dissatisfaction with the establishment, as he questions (and boldly, but effectively lampoons) the relationship of public policy, consumer economics, and popular culture with our personal and collective experience of reality.
He seems to be getting to the deeper argument of conditional reality through his self-deprecating, offensive-to-most, brand of humor. He seems to be to what is illustrated, as Lenny Bruce is to what is spoken. At any rate, this subversively satirical work is a good read for those who are intimately familiar with the real history of the past three decades - and are pissed.
J

In a sense, our guaranteed right to freedom and personal autonomy is only as valid as our willingness to wage war in order to keep it secure. So yes, as long as we allow the Bush administration to wipe its collective ass with our Constitution, we allow our freedoms to be eroded through small order change, i.e. the issuance of unconsitutional executive orders, and the appointment of high ranking officials who would hold unitary executive power in the highest regard. It is quite interesting that Justice Samuel Alito should advocate for plenary presidential power, so as to say the chief executive is above the law (or, rather, is the law), when he makes statements to the contrary. It seems that Alito is willing to adhere to the "rule of law" with regard to his own rulings, but does not see fit to hold our chief executive to the same standard. So much for checks and balances. We'll save the viewpoints of attorney general Alberto Gonzales for another discussion.

HAYES, STEVEN C., STROSAHL, KIRK D., & WILSON, KELLY G. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An Experiental Approach to Behavior Change. New York: The Guilford Press, 1999. Pp. xvi + 304. ISBN 1-57230-481-2.
I am going to tell you about Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, but don't believe a word I say. One must read the book under review here to make sense out of this unorthodox caveat. But perhaps the reader will detect a hint or two in what follows. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is an ongoing struggle (ponder the preceding word string) with the dark side of language. The authors appreciate the enormous limitations of language, exacerbated by its great advantages for humans. Whether used for self-description or for communicative purposes such as found in scientific work, language remains unidimensional and lineal. Unfortunately, the natural world, including living a life, is multidimensional and nonlineal (e.g., Ray & Delprato, 1989). Inherent in all language use is a fundamental communicative indeterminancy: When one is speaking about one component of existence, it is impossible to concurrently refer to another. Although not explicitly acknowledged by the authors of this book, ACT is an attempt to build a psychosocial interventive system that addresses communicative indeterminancy that, in turn, underlies a main target of ACT, that is, verbal knowing. The situation is quite confusing from our everyday perspective. Nonverbal knowing is to know intimately by direct contacts with things in their natural complexity. Yet, we primarily rely on verbal ways of communicating knowledge to ourselves and others. No doubt the high regard graduate faculty typically place on standardized test scores obtained from applicants' verbal responses to ordinary verbal and mathematical (a class of language) stimuli reflects the weight given to language in scholarly and scientific circles. Too infrequently do we confront the inadequacy of language for communicating inter- and intra-personally.
Copyright Psychological Record Winter 2001 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved.
---
Click this link for a more in-depth discussion of ACT and "third wave" behavior therapies: http://www.kognitiva.org/Hayes.htm
Reality is nothing but




A friend sent me this very revealing article. It describes the establishment's latest and greatest attempt to stratify our culture and enslave the souls of our children through discriminatory educational practices.
NO CHILD'S BEHIND LEFT: THE TEST
By Greg Palast
New York -- Today and tomorrow every 8-year-old in the state of New York will take a test. It's part of George Bush's No Child Left Behind program. The losers will be left behind to repeat the third grade.
Try it yourself. This is from the state's actual practice test. Ready, class?
"The year 1999 was a big one for the Williams sisters. In February, Serena won her first pro singles championship. In March, the sisters met for the first time in a tournament final. Venus won. And at doubles tennis, the Williams girls could not seem to lose that year."
And here's one of the four questions:
"The story says that in 1999, the sisters could not seem to lose at doubles tennis. This probably means when they played:
A) two matches in one day
B) against each other
C) with two balls at once
D) as partners
OK, class, do you know the answer? (By the way, I didn't cheat: there's nothing else about "doubles" in the text.)
My kids go to a New York City school in which more than half the students live below the poverty line. There is no tennis court.
There are no tennis courts in the elementary schools of Bed-Stuy or East Harlem. But out in the Hamptons, every school has a tennis court. In Forest Hills, Westchester and Long Island's North Shore, the schools have nearly as many tennis courts as the school kids have live-in maids.
Now, you tell me, class, which kids are best prepared to answer the question about "doubles tennis"? The 8-year-olds in Harlem who've never played a set of doubles or the kids whose mommies disappear for two hours every Wednesday with Enrique the tennis pro?
Is this test a measure of "reading comprehension" -- or a measure of wealth accumulation?
If you have any doubts about what the test is measuring, look at the next question, based on another part of the text, which reads (and I could not make this up):
"Most young tennis stars learn the game from coaches at private clubs. In this sentence, a club is probably a:
E) baseball bat
F) tennis racquet
G) tennis court
J) country club
Helpfully, for the kids in our 'hood, it explains that a "country club" is a, "place where people meet." Yes, but WHICH people?
President Bush told us, " By passing the No Child Left Behind Act, we are regularly testing every child and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing."
But there are no "better options." In the delicious double-speak of class war, when the tests have winnowed out the chaff and kids stamped failed, No Child Left results in that child being left behind in the same grade to repeat the failure another year.
I can 't say that Mr. Bush doesn't offer better options to the kids stamped failed. Under No Child Left, if enough kids flunk the tests, their school is marked a failure and its students win the right, under the law, to transfer to any successful school in their district. You can' t provide more opportunity than that. But they don 't provide it, the law promises it, without a single penny to make it happen. In New York in 2004, a third of a million students earned the right to transfer to better schools -- in which there were only 8,000 places open.
New York is typical. Nationwide, only one out of two-hundred students eligible to transfer manage to do it. Well, there' s always the Army. (That option did not go unnoticed: No Child has a special provision requiring schools to open their doors to military recruiters.)
Hint: When de-coding politicians ' babble, to get to the real agenda, don't read their lips, read their budgets. And in his last budget, our President couldn't spare one thin dime for education, not ten cents. Mr. Big Spender provided for a derisory 8.4 cents on the dollar of the cost of primary and secondary schools. Congress appropriated a half penny of the nation's income -- just one-half of one-percent of America 's twelve trillion dollar GDP -- for primary and secondary education.
President Bush actually requested less. While Congress succeeded in prying out an itty-bitty increase in voted funding, that doesn't mean the extra cash actually gets to the students. Fifteen states have sued the federal government on the grounds that the cost of new testing imposed on schools, $3.9 billion, eats up the entire new funding budgeted for No Child Left.
There are no "better options" for failing children, but there are better uses for them. The President ordered testing and more testing to hunt down, identify and target millions of children too expensive, too heavy a burden, to educate.
No Child Left offers no options for those with the test-score mark of Cain -- no opportunities, no hope, no plan, no funding. Rather, it is the new social Darwinism, educational eugenics: identify the nation's loser-class early on. Trap them then train them cheap.
Someone has to care for the privileged. No society can have winners without lots and lots of losers. And so we have No Child Left Behind -- to produce the new worker drones that will clean the toilets at the Yale Alumni Club, punch the cash registers color-coded for illiterates, and pamper the winner-class on the higher floors of the new economic order.
Class war dismissed.
------------------------------------------------------
See a clip of the actual practice test at http://www.gregpalast.com/

